Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Nihor Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26246 of 2020 Petitioner :- Ram Nihor Pandey Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
The solitary grievance of the petitioner appears to be that his restoration application in case no. 585/394, filed under Section 34/35 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, has remained pending before the respondent no. 2 since 03.05.2016.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping the present petition pending or calling for a counter affidavit.
Without entering into merits of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with the observation that in case the petitioner files a copy of this order before the respondent no. 2, the said authority shall proceed to decide the mutation application pending before him since 03.05.2016 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order before him, provided the petitioner does not seek any adjournment during that period and shall cooperate.
Order Date :- 7.1.2021 SA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Nihor Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 January, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Brijesh Kumar Srivastava