Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Nayan And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4612 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Nayan And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghan Shyam Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
This writ petition has been filed for issuance of mandamus commanding the respondent no.1 i.e., State of U.P. through Consolidation Commissioner, U.P. to take necessary action and remove the illegalities are being committed by the concerned authorities during consolidation operations and accordingly, correct the chaks of the petitioners as well as other co-villagers of Gram Chandpar, Tehsil Khajni, district Gorakhpur.
The prayer in the writ petition is vague, inasmuch as the petitioner as well as other co-villagers of the village have not filed any objection, appeal and revision under the provisions of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act if they were aggrieved by the order of the Consolidation Authorities.
The U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 and the Rules framed thereunder are complete Code and remedies are available to the aggrieved persons.
The writ petition is totally misconceived and is accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.7.2018 Nadeem Ahmad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Nayan And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2018
Judges
  • Rajiv Joshi
Advocates
  • Ghan Shyam Maurya