Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Nath Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Chief Justice's Court
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2391 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Nath Yadav Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Riyajuddin Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tariq Maqbool Khan
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,Chief Justice Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
The cause sought to be agitated in this petition for writ can very well be adjudicated by the executive authorities, if pointed out to them adequately.
The petitioner before approaching this Court though have submitted representations to the Chief Minister and the Divisional Commissioner of the division concerned but not to the District Magistrate, who as a matter of fact is the authority competent.
The petitioner is at liberty to ventilate his grievance by way of submitting a representation to the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 20.12.2019 Bhaskar (Vivek Varma, J.) (Govind Mathur, C.J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Nath Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2019
Judges
  • Govind Mathur Chief
Advocates
  • Riyajuddin Ansari