Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Naresh Pandey vs State Of U P And Ors

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6921 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Naresh Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Buddha Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.
In spite of being retired, the leave encashment of 300 days and G.I.S. have not been extended to the petitioner despite various representations having been made before the authority concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no.4 to consider the claim of the petitioner with regard to entitlement of leave encashment and GIS and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as far as possible, within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with a fresh representation is presented before the authority concerned.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 SKM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Naresh Pandey vs State Of U P And Ors

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2018
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Buddha Prakash