Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18035 of 1997 Petitioner :- Ram Mahesh Respondent :- D.I.O.S., Allahabad & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Y.S.Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- SC, A.K. Yadav, S.K. Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing Recall/Restoration Application.
2. Heard.
3. Cause shown for delay in filing Recall/Restoration Application is sufficient.
4. Condoned.
5. This application is, accordingly, allowed.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Siddhant Sahu (Delay Cond. Appl. 1 of 2018) Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18035 of 1997 Petitioner :- Ram Mahesh Respondent :- D.I.O.S., Allahabad & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Y.S.Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- SC, A.K. Yadav, S.K. Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. This is an application seeing recall of my order dated 07.11.2013.
2. Cause shown for non-appearance is sufficient.
3. Order dated 07.11.2013 is hereby recalled.
4. This application, accordingly, stands allowed.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Siddhant Sahu (Recall Appl. 2 of 2018)
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18035 of 1997 Petitioner :- Ram Mahesh Respondent :- D.I.O.S., Allahabad & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Y.S.Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- SC, A.K. Yadav, S.K. Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Order dated 07.11.2013 having been recalled vide order of date passed on Recall Application, writ petition is restored to its original number.
2. As requested and agreed by learned counsel for parties, I proceed to hear and decide this case at this stage.
3. Sri R.C. Yadav, learned counsel for applicant-petitioner, states that by efflux of time, this writ petition has rendered infructuous.
4. Dismissed accordingly.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Siddhant Sahu