Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Lal vs Assistant Upsrtc And Others & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 33027 of 2002 Petitioner :- Ram Lal Respondent :- Assistant Regional Manager UPSRTC And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjit Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Heard Ms. Bharti Kashyap, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ranjit Saxena, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri U.S. Singh Visen, learned counsel appearing for respondents and perused the material available on record.
2. Petitioner is challenging order dated 15.06.2002 whereby petitioner has been retrenched and certain benefits in the light of provisions of Section 6N(b) of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "U.P. Act, 1947") has been paid to him.
3. However, I find that remedy lies to petitioner before Adjudicatory forum under the provisions of U.P. Act, 1947. Hence, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order since aforesaid statutory remedy is available to him.
4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Lal vs Assistant Upsrtc And Others & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ranjit Saxena