Hon'ble Vedpal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Advocate.
Under challenge in the instant writ petition is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 519 of 2010, under Section 406 IPC, police station Ghazipur, District Lucknow.
We have gone through the FIR.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegations levelled in the FIR are simple in nature and the FIR is an outcome of a dispute between landlord and tenant.
The FIR discloses commission of cognizable offence and cannot be quashed. However, considering the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners, we dispose of the writ petition finally with a direction that unless and until cogent and reliable evidence comes forward against the petitioners, the petitioners shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case crime number, provided they cooperate with the investigation, which shall go on. Order Date :- 30.6.2010 Chauhan/-