Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Krishn @ Karu vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant was challaned under the Gangster Act on the basis of two cases, however, in those cases he is on bail. He further submitted that there is no chances of misuse of liberty of bail if applicant is released on bail and he will not indulge in such activities. There is no criminal history of the applicant apart from the aforesaid case. Co- accused has already been released on bail. In the present case, the applicant is in jail since 16.12.2009.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merit, let the applicant Ram Krishn @ Karu be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in Case Crime No.339 of 2009, under Section 2/3 Gangster Act, P.S. Sikanderpur Vaish, District Kashiram Nagar. Order Date :- 22.6.2010 Pramod
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Krishn @ Karu vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 June, 2010