Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Kishor vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48233 of 2018 Applicant :- Ram Kishor Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against three accused persons, namely Harishchandra, Chhotu and Sonu alleging that on 12.7.2018 they assaulted Reema Devi and Rajeev Kumar (husband of Reema Devi) by kicks and fists. Rajeev received two head injuries, resultantly died. Injuries received by injured Reema Devi are simple in nature. Later on during investigation, the name of the applicant was disclosed by injured/complainant Reema Devi in her statement.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Applicant was not named in the F.I.R. The name of the applicant was disclosed by complainant in her statement. There are general allegations against all accused persons. It is not clear from the prosecution case, who was the author of head injuries due to which he died. There is no independent witness and no legal evidence against the applicant. Offences levelled against the applicant are not attracted in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 16.7.2018 (more than five months) having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no criminal history.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let applicant Ram Kishor involved in Case Crime No. 531 of 2018, under Sections 304, 323, 504, 506, 336 IPC, Police Station Dibiyapur, District Auraiya be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 18.12.2018 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Kishor vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 December, 2018
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Rajeev Kumar Saxena