Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Keshani vs Ram Nayan

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 59
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3040 of 2018 Applicant :- Ram Keshani Opposite Party :- Ram Nayan, Tehsildar Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
A writ petition preferred by the applicant seeking expeditious disposal of proceedings referable to Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 was disposed of with the observation that the Assistant Collector may move in the matter with expedition and ensure that no unnecessary adjournments are granted. From the extract of the order sheet which has been filed in these proceedings and the last order of 26 March 2018, the Court notes that the concerned Assistant Collector was constrained to close the opportunity of the plaintiff-applicant himself since despite repeated opportunities he had failed to file objections.
On an overall conspectus of the aforesaid facts, the Court finds itself unable to hold the Assistant Collector to be in wilful or deliberate disobedience.
The petition is consequently disposed of.
It is however left open to the applicant to approach the Court again in case the matter is inordinately delayed.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 Arun K. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Keshani vs Ram Nayan

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2018
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Pankaj Kumar Mishra