Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Hari vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 25089 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Hari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimlendu Tripathi,Sher Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Bilas Yadav
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of appearance in the UPTET Examination-2018 selection for recruitment of Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic Schools, he has wrongly filled in the roll number on the answer sheet and says that on account of mistake at his end, his result might not be declared.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court to the answer sheet which has been appended as Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition. However, from bare perusal of the same nothing is discernible as to his name, father's name etc. nor, it bears the signature of petitioner Ram Hari.
In view of the above, prima-facie opinion cannot be formed as to whether the grievance raised by the petitioner is genuine or not. In the absence of relevant material on record, no writ can be issued, writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition with all the relevant material.
Order Date :- 28.11.2018 IrfanUddin
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Hari vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2018
Judges
  • Ajit Kumar
Advocates
  • Vimlendu Tripathi Sher Bahadur Yadav