Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Dhyan Yadav vs Union Of India & Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 29528 of 2002 Petitioner :- Ram Dhyan Yadav Respondent :- Union Of India & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadhesh Rai Counsel for Respondent :- S.S.C.,A.K. Rai
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents that they may appoint the petitioner any where in the department concern on the compassionate ground under dying in harness rules and he may be paid salary to meet the economical crises of his family."
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Dhyan Yadav vs Union Of India & Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Awadhesh Rai