Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Briksha Yadav vs M D Purvanchal Electricy Dis Cor Varanasi And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29273 of 2008 Petitioner :- Ram Briksha Yadav Respondent :- M.D. Purvanchal Electricy Dis. Cor. Varanasi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nikhil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- H.P. Dube,S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Case called out.
No one appears for the petitioner.
Sri Mahboob Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondent has sent his illness slip.
Be that as it may, we find that the petitioner was granted a franchisee for the period of two years for distributing electricity bills and collection of revenue by the respondent no.4, to the writ petition. Subsequently, by the impugned orders the franchisee granted to the petitioner was suspended by the order dated 08.05.2008 and thereafter cancelled by the other impugned order dated 26.05.2008.
On 15.11.2008 the petitioner was granted time to ascertain the factual position as to whether any cause survives. At the time of admission on 25.06.2008 this Court stayed the operation of the order dated 26.05.2008.
We find that since the franchisee was granted only for two years and now more than ten years have passed, this writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 29.11.2018 Rahul.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Briksha Yadav vs M D Purvanchal Electricy Dis Cor Varanasi And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2018
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Nikhil Kumar