Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Autar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5891 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Autar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shitla Prasad Chaubey,Brahma Nand Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The controversy raised in the present writ petition stands adjudicated by this Court vide order of date passed in in Writ A No. 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop & Another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others).
Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
For the reasons recorded therein, this petition also stands allowed on the same terms.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 Mukesh Kr.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Autar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2019
Judges
  • Suneet Kumar
Advocates
  • Shitla Prasad Chaubey Brahma Nand Tripathi

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.