Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Autar Dubey vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24950 of 2019 Applicant :- Ram Autar Dubey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Maohammd Nadeem,Ashish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Ram Autar Dubey seeking bail in Case Crime No. 564 of 2018 (Case No.2736 of 2018), under Section 323, 325, 308, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kannauj, District Kannauj.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the present applicant is aged about 72 years and there is cross case against the complainant party also. He further submitted that all the offences which have been alleged to have been committed by the accused are punishable less than seven years. He further submitted that the applicant is in jail since 29.5.2019 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.
Let the applicant Ram Autar Dubey be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 20.6.2019 Mini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Autar Dubey vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 June, 2019
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Maohammd Nadeem Ashish Kumar