Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Adhin vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24314 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Adhin Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheetala Prasad Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.
The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the mutation case instituted in the year 2014 under Section 34 of the UP Land Revenue Act has not been disposed of, till date.
In view of the above, without entering into the merits of the controversy between the parties, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no. 2, Nayab Tehsildar, Khalilabad, District Sant Kabir Nagar to consider and decide the mutation case No. 872 under Section 34 of the UP Land Revenue Act (Ram Adhin vs. Suhel Ahmed) expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him.
Order Date :- 25.7.2019 Priyanka
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Adhin vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2019
Judges
  • Anjani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Sheetala Prasad Pandey