Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8937 of 2019 Applicant :- Rakesh Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. Poonam Singh Sengar, learned A.G.A. for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that only three cases have been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart which has been annexed at annexure-1 to the affidavit accompanying this bail application and in the said cases, the applicant has been granted bail by the competent Court. The applicant is in jail since 31.12.2016.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced and the provisions of Section 19 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, let the applicant- Rakesh Gupta involved in Case Crime No.571 of 2016, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station-Sadar Bazar, District Mathura be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties (of Rs. two lakhs) (one should be of family member), each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 28.2.2019 Dev/-