Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rajveer Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25180 of 2019 Applicant :- Rajveer Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Onkar Nath Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not committed the present offence. Though he is named in the F.I.R. yet he was not present on the spot. He is employed as class-IV employee in District Aligarh and due to that reason the Investigating Officer did not submit charge-sheet against him. Referring to statement of PW-1 recorded it is also submitted that only role of exhortation has been assigned to the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history. It is next contended that main role for causing fire-arm injury is assigned to co-accused Narendra. He is languishing in jail since 15.5.2019 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Rajveer Singh involved in Case Crime No. 432 of 2015, under Sections 302/34, 504 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District - Etah be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 24.6.2019/safi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajveer Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 June, 2019
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Onkar Nath