Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rajveer Singh @ Kallu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32410 of 2018 Applicant :- Rajveer Singh @ Kallu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State, and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against the applicant alleging that on 24.5.2018 he was arrested by the police and recovered one country-made pistol 315 bore, one live cartridges and some materials for manufacturing country made pistols.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Recovery is false and planted. There is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. There is no independent witness against the applicant. He is languishing in jail since 24.5.2018 (more than three months) having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let applicant Rajveer Singh @ Kallu involved in Case Crime No. 257 of 2018, under Section 3/5/25 Arms Act, Police Station Gursahaiganj, District Kannauj be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajveer Singh @ Kallu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2018
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Shailendra Kumar Tripathi