Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raju vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31266 of 2019 Petitioner :- Raju Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar,Urmila Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
1. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
2. Grievance of petitioner is that proposed society namely, Matsya Jivi Sahkari Samiti Maura/Jadauda Panda is to be constituted, for which petitioner has submitted an application to respondent-3 i.e. Assistant Director Fisheries, Saharanpur but he is not taking steps for ensuring registration of said Society.
3. We repeatedly asked learned counsel for petitioner as to under which provision Officers of Fisheries Department are obliged to get registration of proposed Co-operative Society, inasmuch as, under U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965, an application for registration of a society is to be made in the manner prescribed to Registrar after complying with other formalities for such incorporation, but he could give no reply.
4. In our view, Officer of Fisheries Department neither have any obligation nor otherwise are required to themselves ensure constitution of a Co-operative Society at any particular place.
5. In view thereof, this writ petition is thoroughly misconceived. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 September, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Akhilesh Kumar Urmila Shukla