Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Raju And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8509 of 2021 Applicant :- Raju And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mithilesh Kumar Shukla, Avanish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Raju and Amrit Lal, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 399 of 2015, under Sections- 147, 148, 452, 307, 354 IPC, Police Station - Barra, District - Kanpur Nagar during pendency of trial.
3. In view of the direct fact allegation of serious offence levelled in the FIR, the discretion claimed for grant of anticipatory bail is declined.
4. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected, leaving it open to the applicants to apply for regular bail, which application when filed may be dealt with on its own merit as expeditiously as possible, without being prejudiced by any observation made in this order.
Order Date :- 8.4.2021 A.Kr.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Mithilesh Kumar Shukla Avanish Kumar Shukla