Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raju And Others vs Barnadamma W/O Subramani And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|20 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION Nos.8142-8143/2017 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN 1. RAJU S/O LATE MARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. JOSEPH S/O LATE MARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT AMALAGUNDI KALLEMBELLA HOBLI, AGRAHARA POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT PIN CODE: 572125 (BY SRI. SATHEESH H K, ADV.,) ... PETITIONERS AND 1. BARNADAMMA W/O SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. PHILIP S/O LATE MARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESPONDENT Nos.1 & 2 ARE R/AT AMALAGUNDI KALLEMBELLA HOBLI, AGRAHARA POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572125 3. M FATHIMA D/O LATE MARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT 7TH CROSS, RHP COLONY, MADANAPURA POST, WHITEFIELD ROAD, BANGALORE 4. BENADIK S/O LATE MARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 5. PHILOMINA D/O LATE MARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 6. KOLASTIC W/O LATE LARANCE S/O MARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS CORRECT NAME IS SCHOLASTICA W/O LATE LAWRENCE 7. KYATHARIN D/O MARIYANNA W/O RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESPONDENT Nos.6 & 7 ARE R/AT THATRASIPURA KUPPADODDI, AGALAHALLY POST, VYAMBALLI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 571511 8. JAYARANI W/O ANTHONI S/O MARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 9. VIMALARANI D/O MARIYANNA W/O PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 10. JANPAL D/O MARIYANNA S/O PHILOMINA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESPONDENT Nos.4, 5, 8 to 10 ARE R/AT AMALAGUNDI KALLEMBELLA HOBLI, AGRAHARA POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT -572125 11. K SUDHAMANI W/O T R SATISH BABU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT THARUR KALLEMBELLA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572125 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B RAMESH, ADV., FOR R2 TO R4; R1 SERVED NOTICE TO R5 TO R11 IS D/W V/O DATED., 20.09.2017) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMON ORDER DATED 21.01.2017 PASSED ON APPLICATIONS FILED UNDER SEC. 151 OF CPC AND ORDER 18 RULE 17 R/W SEC. 151 CPC AT ANNEX-F BY THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT SIRA IN O.S.422/2011 AND CONSEQUENTLY PASS AN ORDER ALLOWING THE AFORESAID APPLICATIONS AS PRAYED FOR.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R These writ petitions are filed against the order dated 21.01.2017 on the applications filed under Section 151 of CPC and Order 18 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of CPC in O.S.No.422/2011 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Sira ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.422/2011 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petitions do not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petitions stand disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju And Others vs Barnadamma W/O Subramani And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
20 February, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha