Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raju @ Rajveer And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24405 of 2019 Petitioner :- Raju @ Rajveer And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ch. Dil Nisar,Vinay Prakash Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard Sri Vinay Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent concerned, not to arrest the petitioner, with a further prayer for quashing the impugned FIR dated 19.10.2019, registered as Case Crime No.389/2019, under Sections 308/323 IPC, P.S. Fatehpur, Saharanpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case, allegations levelled against them are absolutely false, frivolous and baseless, injury report of the victim is not made available to the petitioner, no offence is made out, FIR be quashed.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer and submits that FIR itself alleges fatal injuries having been caused to the victim on the head, who was referred to the District Hospital, Saharanur, where the conditions of the victim were reported to be serious and the copy of the injury report shall be furnished at an appropriate stage.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence, no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R or staying the arrest of the petitioners.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 Chandra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju @ Rajveer And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Ch Dil Nisar Vinay Prakash Shukla