Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Raju @ Manoj Kumar @ Sanjay Verma vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 August, 2016

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A.for the State of U.P. It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that the trial court has failed to appreciate the evidence in right perspective and erred in recording the finding of conviction, the judgment is thus perverse. Admit and connect with Criminal Appeal No. 3201 of 2016 and Criminal Appeal No. 4020 of 2016. Summon the lower court record within six weeks from today. List immediately after receipt of record.
Order Date :- 19.8.2016 Su Court No. - 49 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4045 of 2016 Appellant :- Raju @ Manoj Kumar @ Sanjay Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- Rakesh Kumar Rathore,Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raghvendra Kumar,J.
Criminal Misc . Bail Application Application No.251641 of 2016 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A.for the State of U.P. Connect with Criminal Appeal No. 3201 of 2016 and Criminal Appeal No. 4020 of 2016. List along with connected appeals for consideration of bail application. Order Date :- 19.8.2016/Su
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju @ Manoj Kumar @ Sanjay Verma vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 August, 2016
Judges
  • Raghvendra Kumar