Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Raju Lala @ Rajeev Bansal vs State Of U P And Anr

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42613 of 2018 Applicant :- Raju Lala @ Rajeev Bansal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Varun Dev Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arvind Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
This application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the chargesheet no. 01/2018 dated 12.8.2018 as well as consequential proceeding thereof arising out of Case Crime no. 0520 of 2018, u/s 504, 506, 354(Ka) IPC and 3(2)(Va) SC/ST Act, P.S. Hathras Kotwali, District Hathras.
At the very out-set learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that he does not want to press the principal prayers seeking quashing of the charge sheet and the entire proceeding as have been made in the application nor is inclined to press the prayer seeking stay of the proceeding. He is ready to submit to the jurisdiction of the court, seek bail and accept all the conditions which this Court may deem fit to impose upon him. The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant is that the hearing of the bail application may be done on the same day.
Heard learned AGA and perused the record.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant the application so far as it relates to seeking quashing of the charge sheet and the entire proceeding and so far as it relates to seeking stay of the proceeding, stands dismissed.
However, it is directed that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
For a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant surrenders and applies for bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.
With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 D/V
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju Lala @ Rajeev Bansal vs State Of U P And Anr

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2018
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Varun Dev Sharma