Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28899 of 2021 Applicant :- Raju Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Waseem Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard Mohammad Waseem, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.264 of 2021, under Sections 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 188, 270, 269 I.P.C. and Section 51 of Disaster Management Act, Police Station Izzat Nagar, District Bareilly during the pendency of trial.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case on the basis of false and joint recovery of one quintal beef (cow meat). No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession or pointing out of the applicant. The alleged recovery of one quintal beef (cow meat) was made from the house of co- accused, Aslam, which is without complying the mandatory provisions of Section 100 Cr.P.C. It is further contended that the co-accused Mohd. Tasleem and Aslam Shah have already been released on bail by coordinate benches of this Court vide orders dated 25.08.2021 and 20.09.2021 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.31527 of 2021 and 32745 of 2021, the case of the applicant stands on identical footing to that of the co-accused, hence, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Lastly it is contended that the applicant is in jail since 21.05.2021 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let the applicant,Raju Khan involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 24.9.2021 S.P.