Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raju Chaurasia @ Raja vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25407 of 2019 Applicant :- Raju Chaurasia @ Raja Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Kumar Singh,Achal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
This bail application has been preferred by the accused- applicant, Raju Chaurasia @ Raja, who is involved in Case Crime No. 10 of 2019, under Sections 392, 411 I.P.C., P.S. G.
R. P., District- Ghaziapur.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that applicant is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been falsely implicated in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. It is further submitted that after completion of investigation charge sheet in the present case has been filed on 22.04.2019. The applicant has no previous criminal history as explained in para-22 of the bail application, he is not likely to abscond. The applicant is in jail since 09.04.2019.
Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of State-respondent vehemently opposed the bail application but not contradicted the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and going through the record, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let applicant, Raju Chaurasia @ Raja be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(i). The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence, if the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law;
(ii). The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
(iii). In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019 AKT
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju Chaurasia @ Raja vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • Chandra Dhari Singh
Advocates
  • Prashant Kumar Singh Achal Singh