Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rajpal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26592 of 2019 Petitioner :- Rajpal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Sunder Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Diwakar Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that now the petitioner has been allotted the shop regarding which the resolution has been passed. The writ petition, therefore, had become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 26.8.2019 praveen.
(Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajpal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 August, 2019
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Shyam Sunder Mishra

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.