Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Rajnish Jain vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16394 of 2020 Applicant :- Rajnish Jain Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey,Rohit Nandan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Daga,Sumit Jaiswal
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Sri Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Sumit Jaiswal for the respondents jointly submits that parties have entered into a compromise in Case Crime No. 195 of 2018 under section 420, 406 IPC, police station – Swaroop Nagar, District – Kanpur Nagar. This compromise is duly verified by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 1, Kanpur Nagar vide order dated 28.1.2021 and in view of such compromise, nothing survives for adjudication in the present case. Therefore the application is allowed.
Nobody is appearing to oppose the factum of such compromise.
In terms of the verification of the compromise, proceedings of Case Crime No. 195 of 2018 under section 420, 406 IPC, police station – Swaroop Nagar, District – Kanpur Nagar are hereby quashed.
In above terms, petition is disposed off.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 S.K.S.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajnish Jain vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 August, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Agarwal
Advocates
  • Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Rohit Nandan Pandey