Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2858 of 2019 Petitioner :- Rajmati Respondent :- The District Magistrate And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1, 2 and 5.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the respondents no.3 and 4.
The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to the respondent no.2/Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Maharajganj to decide the Revision No.64/27.10.2016, Computer Case No.D2016054701104, Rajmati Vs. Santosh Agrawal and another, within stipulated period.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent no.2/Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Maharajganj to consider and decide the aforesaid revision in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, except upon payment of cost.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019 Pramod Tripathi