Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rajmala And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14588 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rajmala And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogendra Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ajay Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Yogendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri N.K. Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent not to arrest the petitioners and with further prayer for quashing the impugned FIR dated 19.03.2018 registered as case crime no. 0102 of 2018, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC , P.S. Mundali, District Meerut.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the impugned FIR has been lodged by the respondent no. 3 containing absolutely false, concocted, vague allegations against them. It has next been submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the FIR no credible evidence whatsoever is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the petitioners' complicity in the commission of the alleged offence hence the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed.
Per contra learned AGA for the State submitted that the impugned FIR is not liable to be quashed on the basis of the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties present and perused the impugned FIR as well as the other material brought on record, we dispose of this writ petition with the following directions:
(i) Investigation of the aforesaid case shall go on but the petitioner no.1 shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case till the submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., subject to his cooperation during investigation.
(ii) As far as the petitioner no. 2 is concerned, the petition stands dismissed.
With this direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 31.5.2018 AU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajmala And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Yogendra Pal Singh