Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Rajeshbhai vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|25 June, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Rule, Mr.
Kodekar, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of rule for respondent - State.
2. The instant application is filed seeking regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Rajula Police Station, Rajula, District-Amreli C.R.No. I-53/2012 regarding the offences punishable under Sections 306, 504 r/w Section 114 of the IPC.
3. Mr. VD Nanavati, learned advocate for the applicants took me through the relevant parts of the FIR and submitted that this Court has granted bail to two identically situated co-accused persons and submits that the application may be allowed.
4. Mr.
Kodekar, learned APP for the respondent-State opposed this application.
5. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides, so also considering the role attributed to the applicants in the FIR as well as considering the copies of the orders passed by this Court annexed with this application, the application deserves to be allowed.
6. Learned counsel for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.
7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and the applicants are ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. being Rajula Police Station, Rajula, District-Amreli C.R.No. I-53/2012, on executing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that they shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;
(d) not leave India without prior permission of the trial Court concerned;
(e) mark presence at the concerned police station on the first Sunday of every month between 10.00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m. for three months only;
(f) furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court.
8. The Authorities will release the applicants only if not required in connection with any other offence for the time being.
9. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the trial Court concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case.
11. For modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions herein above, the applicants will be at liberty to approach the concerned Court and such Court shall decide the application for modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions of this order in accordance with law.
12. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.
13. Rule is made absolute accordingly. The application is disposed of.
14. Direct service is permitted.
(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) Ashish N.
Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajeshbhai vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
25 June, 2012