Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rajendra Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38396 of 2019 Applicant :- Rajendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the material available on record.
Accused-applicant, involved in Case Crime No. 338 of 2019, under Section 2/3 Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti- Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Khutar, District Shahjahanpur, applied for bail.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case on account of enmity for the purpose of harassment. Applicant committed no offence. A false and fabricated story has been set up by the police. He further submits that there are five cases in gang chart and in Crime No. 92 of 2018, he is not wanted as per police report dated 5.9.2019 and in Crime No. 775 of 2010 accused has been acquitted, in Crime No. 224 of 2015 and Crime No. 856 of 2015 accused has been fined and the same has been deposited by the applicant, there is no case, and in rest of two cases he is on bail. Applicant is in jail since 30.6.2019. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but did not dispute the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that applicant is a member of gang, having five cases against him, as shown in gang chart.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, rival contention of learned counsel for the parties, detention of applicant in jail, severity of punishment in case of conviction, number of cases shown in gang chart and without commenting upon the merit of the case, applicant deserves bail.
Accordingly, bail application is allowed.
Let applicant Rajendra Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties and filing an undertaking to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities or case.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 SKS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajendra Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2019
Judges
  • Rajendra Kumar Iv
Advocates
  • Jai Prakash Singh