Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rajendra Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 56532 of 2019 Applicant :- Rajendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit has been filed today. Taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Jitendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Nagendra Srivastava, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Rajendra Singh with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. - 238 of 2019, under Sections - 307, 323 IPC, Police Station - Merapur, District - Farrukhabad, during pendency of trial.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, at present:
(i) the applicant is accused of attempt to commit murder and other offence, punishable with imprisonment of upto life;
(ii) against FIR lodged on 16.11.2019, the applicant is in confinement since 19.11.2019;
(iii) the applicant claims to have cooperated in the investigation. In any case he is not shown to have unduly evaded arrest;
(iv) the applicant has no criminal history;
(v) though investigation is pending yet at present no justifiable cause has been shown to continue the detention of the applicant for an indefinite period;
(vi) on prima facie basis, only for purpose of grant of bail, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case for collateral reasons, inasmuch as, the main accusation of firearm injury is against the co- accused Pintoo and the applicant has only been assigned the role of catching hold whereas the injury is in the head region which renders the role of catching hold improbable;
(vii) in any case, no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressuring the witness, during the investigation or trial.
(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the investigation/trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
6. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, the bail being granted shall be cancelled.
7. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 18.12.2019 Prakhar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajendra Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 December, 2019
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Jitendra Kumar Mishra