Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rajendra Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27763 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kaushik,Sudhir Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Hon'ble Daya Shankar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Kirtika Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
The petitioner wants an injunction against the private respondent nos. 5 and 6, restraining them from interfering in his peaceful possession of running the brick kiln.
Against private respondents, injunction cannot be granted in writ jurisdiction. However, the appropriate remedy available to the petitioner would be to approach the Civil Court.
We, accordingly, dismiss this writ petition leaving it open to the petitioner to avail proper remedy under law.
Order Date :- 21.8.2018 SR (Daya Shankar Tripathi, J.) (Vikram Nath, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajendra Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 August, 2018
Judges
  • Vikram Nath
Advocates
  • Ashish Kaushik Sudhir Srivastava