Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9482 of 2002 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 15.9.2001 (Annexure IV) and 7.2.2002 (Annexure VIII) to this writ petition.
(b) issue a writ order or diredction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to give effect to the impugned orders dated 15.9.2001 and 7.2.2002 passed by the respondent no. 3 (Annexure IV and VIII) to this writ petition and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue to function as company commandant, company No. 8, Barkhera District Pilibhit.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 PS