Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rajendra Prasad And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 41258 of 2002 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jai Prakash Narain Raj,Akhilesh Cd Srivastava,Rakesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioners have sought following relief:
“Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents concerned to allow the petitioners to continue to work on the post of Guest Speakers and to pay them salary on a month to month basis.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also relief sought and find that petitioners are not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioners have lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioners is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajendra Prasad And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Jai Prakash Narain Raj Akhilesh Cd Srivastava Rakesh Tripathi