Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rajendra Kumar Jain vs Cantonment Board

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 59
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9448 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Jain Respondent :- Cantonment Board Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- Shashwat Kishore Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Grievance of the petitioner is that Application 6C in Original Suit No.534 of 2018 (Vrijnandan Maurya v. Harpal and others), pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division ), Bareilly, is not being decided.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, no useful purpose will be served to keep this petition pending and call for a counter affidavit.
In view of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of providing that the concerned court below shall decide Stay Application (Paper No.6C) in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within eight weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order and without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 Ak/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajendra Kumar Jain vs Cantonment Board

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2018
Judges
  • Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Advocates
  • Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari