Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Rajeev Singhal And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 85
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14073 of 2021 Applicant :- Rajeev Singhal And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to set aside the entire proceedings of complaint case no.
134 Of 2019 Rameshwar Dayal Vs. Rajeev Singhal and another, under sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and section 3(2)Dha of SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali Jalesar, District Etah pending in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) AcT, Etah as well as Summoning order dated 30.1.2021.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he does not want to press other prayers made in the prayer clause and has only made a prayer for expeditious disposal of their bail application in view of law laid down in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Considering the prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if the applicants appear/ surrender before the court below and apply for bail within thirty days from today, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
For a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants appear/ surrender and apply for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 13.8.2021 RPD
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajeev Singhal And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 August, 2021
Judges
  • Gautam Chowdhary
Advocates
  • Ajay Kumar Pathak