Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rajeev Kumar Sharma vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17524 of 2004 Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press the writ petition. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to make payment of salary of the petitioner since December, 2003 till date with all consequential benefits. "
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Ravi Prakash
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajeev Kumar Sharma vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ashutosh Tiwari