Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rajesh Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22881 of 2019 Applicant :- Rajesh Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Upadhyaya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not committed the present offence. Offence is said to have been committed on 18.7.2018 but F.I.R. was lodged on 22.7.2018 and girl returned on 22.7.2018. Though she has stated in the statement under Section 161 CrPC to attract the offence under Section 376 IPC yet when she was examined under Section 164 CrPC by the concerned Magistrate, nothing was stated by her to attract the said offence. The applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 22.8.2018 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Rajesh Yadav involved in Case Crime No. 1072 of 2018, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Vijay Nagar, District - Ghaziabad be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019/safi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajesh Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Anurag Upadhyaya