Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri P.K. Singh, Bisen, learned counsel for the opposite party No.4.
In view of the proposed order, the notice to opposite party No.2 is hereby dispensed with as no prejudice is being caused to him by passing this order.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pass an order in respect of the renewal of the service of the petitioner for the post of Instructor, Physical Education, in the interest of justice;
(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to permit the petitioner to continue as Instructor, Physical Education in terms of Government Order dated 31.01.2013, in the interest of justice;
(iii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties directing them to pass an order to pay the revised honorarium amount @ Rs.17,000/- per month as revised by Central Government, in the interest of justice."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the identical issue, this Court at Allahabad has granted an interim order dated 08.09.2020 in Writ-A No.6356 of 2020; Prabhu Shanker and 6 others vs. State of U.P. & others.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that for redressal of his grievance the petitioner has preferred representations dated 24.07.2019 and 27.07.2019 to the District Basic Education Officer, Pratapgarh but no decision has been taken on the same till date.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 i.e. the District Basic Education Officer, Pratapgarh ventilating his grievance and the direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner with expedition.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representations is issued.
In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 i.e. the District Basic Education Officer, Pratapgarh raising all his pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representations and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with the representation and the decision thereof be communicated to the petitioner forthwith.
In view of the aforesaid terms, the writ petition is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 29.1.2021 Suresh/ [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]