Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Rajat Srivastava vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 May, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State through video conferencing.
The F.I.R. impugned herein is registered as FIR No. 114 of 2021, under Section 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 323, 427 I.P.C. and Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, police station Hasanganj, district Lucknow.
From a plain reading of the F.I.R., it appears that a cognizable offence, prima facie, is made out against the petitioner. It is well settled that once the F.I.R. discloses commission of cognizable offence, interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is impermissible in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Harayana and others versus Bhajan Lal and other, AIR 1992 SC 604; State of Bihar and another versus Md. Khalique and another, 2002(1) SCC 652 and Girish Kumar Suneja versus Central Bureau of Investigation(2017) 14 SCC 809.
The writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the remedy of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.p.c. available to the petitioner.
Order Date :- 26.5.2021 Md Faisal
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajat Srivastava vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 May, 2021
Judges
  • Attau Rahman Masoodi
  • Ajai Kumar Srivastava I