IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.3614-3615 OF 2015 (GM - CPC) BETWEEN:
1. RAJANNA @ L.C.RAJU, WRONGLY SHOWN IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF THE TRIAL COURT AND APPELLATE COURT AS RAJA, S/O CHANNAVEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2. L.PUTTAIAH, S/O LATE MUDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT LINGAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KADABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK – 572 216, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
(BY SRI.MOHAN BHAT, ADV.) AND:
1. PYARIBEE, W/O LATE MD.AMEER SAB, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2. BHASHA, S/O LATE MD. AMEER SAB, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT LINGAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, … PETITIONERS KADABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK – 572 216, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHANTARAJ K., ADV., FOR R1 AND R2) - - -
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE – M DATED 25.08.2014 IN M.A.NO.7/2009 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUBBI THEREBY DISMISS THE APPLICATION I.A.NO.I FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 & 2 OF THE CPC.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners praying to withdraw the writ petitions as they have become infructuous.
The same is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn as the same has become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE rs