Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raja @ Mohd Sakib vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30479 of 2019 Applicant :- Raja @ Mohd Sakib Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Kalim Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Mohd. Kalim, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Amit Singh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Raja @ Mohd Sakib with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 463 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Deoband, District- Saharanpur, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that it is a cross case. F.I.R. has been lodged for the incident dated 08.06.2019, from both sides i.e. from applicant's side and from informant's side, in which, four persons from the side of the applicant and three persons from the side of the informant have sustained injuries. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. There is no specific allegations against him and who was the aggressor cannot be determined at this stage. The applicant is languishing in jail since 08.06.2019. The applicant has no criminal history except in the present case. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Considering the material/evidence brought on record, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties as well as the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019 Priya
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raja @ Mohd Sakib vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • S Manju Rani Chauhan
Advocates
  • Mohd Kalim