Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Raj Vanshi Yadav vs Mahanideshak Prantiya Rakshak Dal/Vikas Dal & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16757 of 2001 Petitioner :- Raj Vanshi Yadav Respondent :- Mahanideshak Prantiya Rakshak Dal/Vikas Dal & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
“I. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to release the due amount with interest in the suspension period in favour of the petitioner.”
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raj Vanshi Yadav vs Mahanideshak Prantiya Rakshak Dal/Vikas Dal & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 August, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Vivek Prakash Mishra