Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Raj Saharma@ Brijesh vs State Of U P And Anohter

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4110 of 2021 Applicant :- Raj Saharma@ Brijesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anohter Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.
The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Raj Saharma@ Brijesh, with a prayer to release his on bail in Case Crime No.227 of 2020, under Sections-363, 366 I.P.C. and 16/17 POCSO Act, Police Station-Nautanwa, District-Maharajganj, during pendency of trial.
There is allegation of enticement and abduction of minor girl against the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the girl is not minor but major.
There is no material to substantiate the argument that the victim is major. Learned counsel for the applicant has passed on High School mark-sheet of the victim which shows that she is aged about 17 years, six months. Therefore, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant.
Application is, accordingly, rejected.
Order Date :- 7.4.2021 SS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raj Saharma@ Brijesh vs State Of U P And Anohter

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 April, 2021
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Pawan Kumar