Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Raj Pal And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38723 of 2018 Petitioner :- Raj Pal And 15 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uttar Kumar Goswami Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The petitioners' contention is that after proceedings under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were initiated against them, they were not being allowed to enter the plots in question and, therefore, a prayer has been made that the proceedings under section 67 of the Code may be expedited.
Under such circumstances, it is being directed that the respondent no.2-Collector/District Magistrate, Kasganj shall decide the Case No.00314/2018 (Computer Case No.D-201818750000314) (Tota Ram Vs. Raj Pal & Ors.) within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.11.2018 GS (Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raj Pal And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2018
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Uttar Kumar Goswami