Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23030 of 2021 Petitioner :- Raj Pal Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Jay Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
2. Notice need not to be issued to the respondents no. 4 to 6 at this stage.
3. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon the respondent no. 2 to conclude the proceedings initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the application filed by the petitioner under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code various dates have been fixed but till date the proceedings in question have not been concluded.
5. Sub Rule (6) of Rule 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 provides for the period in which proceedings initiated under Section 67 has to be concluded.
6. In view of the above, respondent no. 2 is expected to comply the provisions of Sub Rule (6) of Rule 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, in accordance with law, after hearing all the concerned parties.
7. Writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.9.2021 Kushal