Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Raj Kumar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23663 of 2018 Applicant :- Raj Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhakar Yadav,Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Counter affidavit filed on behalf of State is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the co- accused Jagdish having similar role have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 02.08.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1517 of 2018, a copy of said order has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the rejoinder affidavit filed in connected Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 23615 of 2018 and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 09.02.2018.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any view on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant Raj Kumar be released on bail in Case Crime No. 946 of 2017, under Sections 363, 366, 368 IPC, Police Station- Katra, District- Shahjahanpur on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trail and remain present personally on each and every date fixed after release. (ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 29.8.2018 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raj Kumar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 August, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Sudhakar Yadav Ramesh Kumar Pandey